4.7 Article

Effects of sub-lethal and chronic lead concentrations on blood and liver ALA-D activity and hematological parameters in Nile tilapia

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 250-256

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.028

关键词

Lead; delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase; Hematological parameters; Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus); Fish; Environmental monitoring

资金

  1. Brazilian funding agency FAPERJ
  2. Brazilian funding agency CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver and blood delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALA-D) inhibition by exposure to sub-lethal lead concentrations over time in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) were investigated. All three lead concentrations (1 mg kg(-1), 10 mg kg(-1) and 100 mg kg(-1)) significantly inhibited ALA-D activity in blood (319 +/- 29.2; 180 +/- 14.6 and 172 +/- 19 mu mols(-1) h(-1) L-1 respectively) and liver (302 +/- 5.84; 201 +/- 41.4 and 93 +/- 22.1 mu mols(-1) h(-1) L-1) 24 h after injection relative to controls (blood: 597 +/- 37.0 mu mols(-1) h(-1) L-1; liver: 376 +/- 23.1 mu mols(-1) h(-1) L-1). Blood ALA-D was greatly inhibited in all but the highest lead dose. Fish were then exposed to 1 mg kg(-1) lead for 9 days, and presented short-term hyperglycemia, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit values and time-dependent blood ALA-D activity inhibition, corroborating blood ALA-D activity as being more suitable for investigating lead effects, showing dose and time-dependent ALA-D inhibition after lead exposure. The results of the present study also demonstrated that fish size affects blood ALA-D activity, as fish from the 24-h assay, which were slightly smaller (approximately 200 g), showed higher ALA-D inhibition in response to lead exposure when compared to the fish from the 9-day assay (approximately 500 g). Thus, fish size should always be taken into account both in the field and in laboratory settings, and efforts should be made to obtain uniform fish size samples for biomarker studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据