4.5 Article

Influence of Copper Addition in AlSi7MgCu Alloy on Microstructure Development and Tensile Strength Improvement

期刊

METALS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met10121623

关键词

AlSi7MgCu alloy; copper; microstructure; solidification sequence; mechanical properties

资金

  1. University of Zagreb Faculty of Metallurgy [IP-124]
  2. Centre for Foundry Technology-SIMET [KK.01.1.1.02.0020]
  3. VIRTULAB-Integrated laboratory for primary and secondary raw materials [KK.01.1.1.02.0022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial AlSi7Mg alloy represents the usual choice for complex geometry casting production. The market imperative to improve mechanical properties imposed the design of new chemical composition of AlSi7MgCu alloy with high content of Cu (up to 1.435 wt.%). This represents a challenge in order to achieve advanced properties. The interaction of a number of alloying (Si, Mg, Cu) and trace elements (Fe, Mn) influenced a wide range of complex reactions occurring and therefore leading to intermetallic phase precipitation. The characterization of novel chemical composition interaction and its solidification sequence was achieved by modelling an equilibrium phase diagram, simultaneously performing both thermal analysis and metallographic investigations. Copper influence was indicated in the whole solidification process starting with infiltration in modified Chinese script phase Al-15(Fe,Mn,Cu)(3)Si-2, beside common intermetallic Al5FeSi. Copper addition encourages formation of compact complex intermetallic phases Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 and Al-8(Fe,Mn,Cu)Mg3Si6. Solidification ended with secondary eutectic alpha(Al) + Al2Cu + beta(Si). Microstructure investigation allows volume reconstruction of the microstructure and distribution of particular phases. Chemical compositions enriched in copper content and developed microstructural constituent through solidification sequence of AlSi7MgCu alloy contribute to a significant increase in mechanical properties already in an as-cast state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据