4.7 Article

Comparative ecotoxicology study of two neoteric solvents: Imidazolium ionic liquid vs. glycerol derivative

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 429-434

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.05.021

关键词

Solvents; Ecotoxicology; Ionic liquid; Glycerol-derivative

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO [CTQ2013-44867-P, CFQ2014-52367-R]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. Gobierno de Aragon (Grupos Consolidados) [E11, E105]
  4. SL: Pinares de Venecia Division Energetica [EEE53]
  5. Brial (ENATICA)
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [E105] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we have compared the acute ecotoxicity of two solvents, with very different structure and origin, but sharing many physical-chemical properties, so they can be used for similar purposes; a well-known ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIM][PF6]) and a solvent partially derived from biomass, 3-bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)propan-2-ol (BTFIP). We have used three biomodels (Vibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio) and performed the comparison applying the Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) hazard assessment. According to the results, ecotoxicity of [BMIM][PF6] and BTFIP is quite similar in the simplest model Vibrio fischeri, while in Daphnia magna [BMIM][PF6] is clearly more toxic. However, in Danio rerio, toxicity of these chemicals is again quite similar and both can be classified as nontoxic. The higher index value of [BMIM][PF6] in water mediate effect in the EHS assessment indicates that this ionic liquid is more dangerous than BTFIP, although accumulation and degradation properties have not been taken into account. Further studies will be necessary to ascertain these conclusions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据