4.4 Article

Perception and Evaluation in Human-Robot Interaction: The Human-Robot Interaction Evaluation Scale (HRIES)-A Multicomponent Approach of Anthropomorphism

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 1517-1539

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-020-00667-4

关键词

Robot perception; Robot evaluation; Anthropomorphism; Scale; Questionnaire; Human-robot interaction

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article consolidates lessons learned from three different studies and proposes a more developed questionnaire based on a multicomponent approach of anthropomorphism, incorporating traits from psychosocial theory and the de-humanization theory. Factor analyses reveal a four sub-dimensions scale including Sociability, Agency, Animacy, and the Disturbance, discussing their implications on future perception of and attitudes towards robots.
The evaluation of how (human) individuals perceive robots is a central issue to better understand human-robot interaction (HRI). On this topic, promising proposals have emerged. However, present tools are not able to assess a sufficient part of the composite psychological dimensions involved in the evaluation of HRI. Indeed, the percentage of variance explained is often under the recommended threshold for a construct to be valid. In this article, we consolidate the lessons learned from three different studies and propose a further developed questionnaire based on a multicomponent approach of anthropomorphism by adding traits from psychosocial theory about the perception of others and the attribution and deprivation of human characteristics: the de-humanization theory. Among these characteristics, the attribution of agency is of main interest in the field of social robotics as it has been argued that robots could be considered as intentional agents. Factor analyses reveal a four sub-dimensions scale including Sociability, Agency, Animacy, and the Disturbance. We discuss the implication(s) of these dimensions on future perception of and attitudes towards robots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据