4.6 Article

Phenylketonuria Diagnosis by Massive Parallel Sequencing and Genotype-Phenotype Association in Brazilian Patients

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12010020

关键词

next-generation sequencing; molecular diagnosis; phenylketonuria; phenylalanine hydroxylase; PAH

资金

  1. FIPE-HCPA [2015-0556]
  2. National Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES-Brazil)
  3. National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq-Brazil)
  4. UFRGS Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thirty-four Brazilian patients with PKU were analyzed using next-generation sequencing, revealing 26 different pathogenic variants. A novel pathogenic variant was found that may affect the stability and activity of the PAH enzyme.
Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a common inborn error of amino acid metabolism in which the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase, which converts phenylalanine to tyrosine, is functionally impaired due to pathogenic variants in the PAH gene. Thirty-four Brazilian patients with a biochemical diagnosis of PKU, from 33 unrelated families, were analyzed through next-generation sequencing in the Ion Torrent PGM (TM) platform. Phenotype-genotype correlations were made based on the BioPKU database. Three patients required additional Sanger sequencing analyses. Twenty-six different pathogenic variants were identified. The most frequent variants were c.1315+1G>A (n = 8/66), c.473G>A (n = 6/66), and c.1162G>A (n = 6/66). One novel variant, c.524C>G (p.Pro175Arg), was found in one allele and was predicted as likely pathogenic by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria. The molecular modeling of p.Pro175Arg indicated that this substitution can affect monomers binding in the PAH tetramer, which could lead to a change in the stability and activity of this enzyme. Next-generation sequencing was a fast and effective method for diagnosing PKU and is useful for patient phenotype prediction and genetic counseling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据