4.5 Article

Small (<5 nm), Clean, and Well-Structured Cubic Platinum Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Electrochemical Characterization

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 49-52

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.202001336

关键词

electrocatalysis; nanoparticles; particle shape; particle size; surface structure

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion-FEDER (Spain) [PID2019-105653GB-100]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2020/063]
  3. VITC (Vicerrectorado de Investigacion y Transferencia de Conocimiento) of the University of Alicante [UATALENTO16-02]
  4. FAPESP [2019/08051-0, 2017/15469-5, 15/26308-7]
  5. Estonian Research Council [PUTJD841]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By controlling the shape, metal nanoparticles can be significantly improved for electrocatalysis, but overcoming limitations from large particle size is necessary for practical applications, where nanoparticles should be smaller than 5 nm. Researchers synthesized 3-5 nm cubic Pt nanoparticles with about 40% preferential {100} structure on the surface.
Shape-controlled metal nanoparticles are significantly improving the electrocatalysis of many relevant reactions. By controlling the shape of nanoparticles, it is possible to engineer their surface to exhibit a preferential structure. However, to facilitate the incorporation of shaped nanomaterials into practical electrochemical devices, it is indispensable to overcome limitations caused by their large particle size (typically >5 nm). For practical applications, nanoparticles must have a size lower than 5 nm with a clean surface to decrease costs and provide a sufficiently large specific surface area. This is a major challenge that has remained unexplored up to now. Herein, we present the synthesis and electrochemical characterization of 3-5 nm, with well-defined cubic Pt nanoparticles supported on carbon. The electrochemical characterization of the nanoparticles evidences the existence of a preferential {100} and clean structure (within about 40 % of {100} terrace surface).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据