4.6 Review

Review on Carbon Dioxide Utilization for Cycloaddition of Epoxides by Ionic Liquid-Modified Hybrid Catalysts: Effect of Influential Parameters and Mechanisms Insight

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11010004

关键词

greenhouse gas; ionic liquid; mesoporous silica; cycloaddition; poly-carbonate

资金

  1. USM, Penang, Malaysia
  2. Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [IFKSURP-335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review article focuses on the role of ionic liquid-modified hybrid materials in cycloaddition reactions, with a special emphasis on the synthesis of cyclic carbonates. Factors such as reaction temperature and CO2 partial pressure are found to play a key role in cyclic carbonate formation. Solvent effect is also discussed as an influential parameter in the conversion of cyclic/aromatic oxides to polycarbonates.
The storage, utilization, and control of the greenhouse (CO2) gas is a topic of interest for researchers in academia and society. The present review article is dedicating to cover the overall role of ionic liquid-modified hybrid materials in cycloaddition reactions. Special emphasis is on the synthesis of various cyclic carbonate using ionic liquid-based modified catalysts. Catalytic activity studies have discussed with respect to process conditions and their effects on conversion and product selectivity for the reaction of cycloaddition of CO2 with styrene oxide. The reaction temperature and the partial pressure of CO2 have found to play a key role in cyclic carbonate formation. The role of other influential parameter (solvent effect) is also discussed for the conversion of cyclic/aromatic oxides to polycarbonate production. Our own research work that deals with ionic liquid-based halide-modified mesoporous catalyst (MCM-41 type) derived from rice husk waste has also been discussed. Finally, the role of carbon dioxide activation and ring-opening mechanisms involved in the cyclic carbonate product formation from CO2 have been discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据