4.6 Article

Mechanistic Insights into Selective Hydrogenation of C=C Bonds Catalyzed by CCC Cobalt Pincer Complexes: A DFT Study

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11020168

关键词

hydrogenation; homogeneous catalysis; catalytic mechanism; cobalt pincer complex; density functional theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational investigation using density functional theory revealed that the less stable dihydride isomer ((CCC)-C-Mes)Co(H)(2) is the real catalyst in hydrogenations of hex-5-en-2-one, isoprene, and 4-vinylcyclohex-1-ene. The turnover-limiting steps in all three reactions involve the formations of C-H bonds through H-2 cleavages. The selectivity of hydrogenation in different C=C bonds primarily depends on steric effects, while the selectivity between C=C and C=O bonds may be influenced by electronic effects.
The mechanistic insights into hydrogenations of hex-5-en-2-one, isoprene, and 4-vinylcyclohex-1-ene catalyzed by pincer ((CCC)-C-Mes)Co (Mes = bis(mesityl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene)phenyl) complexes are computationally investigated by using the density functional theory. Different from a previously proposed mechanism with a cobalt dihydrogen complex ((CCC)-C-Mes)Co-H-2 as the catalyst, we found that its less stable dihydride isomer, ((CCC)-C-Mes)Co(H)(2), is the real catalyst in those catalytic cycles. The generations of final products with H-2 cleavages for the formations of C-H bonds are the turnover-limiting steps in all three hydrogenation reactions. We found that the hydrogenation selectivity of different C=C bonds in the same compound is dominated by the steric effects, while the hydrogenation selectivity of C=C and C=O bonds in the same compound could be primarily influenced by the electronic effects. In addition, the observed inhabition of the hydrogenation reactions by excessive addition of PPh3 could be explained by a 15.8 kcal/mol free energy barrier for the dissociation of PPh3 from the precatalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据