4.6 Article

Smoking cessation and shared decision-making practices about lung cancer screening among primary care providers

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 1357-1365

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3714

关键词

lung cancer screening; primary care providers; shared decision-making; smoking cessation; survey

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP190210]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant [RP170259]
  3. National Cancer Institute [P30CA016672]
  4. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary care providers often engage in smoking cessation counseling with their patients, but do not have a clear preference for type of treatment and rarely use follow-ups for quitting smoking. While many providers report shared decision-making about LCS, few use a decision aid for this conversation.
Objective: We describe primary care providers' current practice patterns related to smoking cessation counseling and lung cancer screening (LCS). Methods: Family, internal medicine, and pulmonary medicine providers from two medical centers were asked to complete an electronic survey to report their practice patterns. Results: Of 52 participating providers, most reported initiating three major components of a smoking cessation intervention often or very often: advise to quit (50, 96%), assess willingness to quit (47, 90%), and assist with counseling or pharmacotherapy (49, 94%). However, other components were less commonly initiated such as arranging follow-ups (only 11 providers indicated recommending them often or very often, 21%) and less than half of providers reported that they often or very often recommend cessation counseling or pharmacotherapy of any type (except varenicline), though family medicine providers were more likely to recommend pharmacotherapy compared to the other specialists (p < 0.01). The majority of providers (47, 92%) reported that they engage in informed/shared decision-making about LCS, although only about one-third (17, 33%) indicated using a patient decision aid. Pulmonary medicine providers were more likely to use decision aids than providers from internal or family medicine (p < 0.04). Conclusions: Within the context of LCS, primary care providers report often having conversations about smoking cessation with their patients who smoke, have no clear preference for type of treatment, and rarely use follow-up calls or visits pertaining to quitting smoking. While many providers report engaging in shared decision-making about LCS, few use a decision aid for this conversation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据