4.5 Article

Nanoscale Analysis of Surface Bending Strain in Film Substrates for Preventing Fracture in Flexible Electronic Devices

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202001662

关键词

bending; flexible electronics; polymer films; soft robotics; surface strain

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H05422, JP18K14297, JP20K15339]
  2. JST CREST, Japan [JPMJCR18I4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a surface-labeled grating method for measuring surface bending strains in materials accurately and without the need for additional material information. By reducing surface bending strains, the fracture limit of hard coatings on flexible substrates was successfully determined.
With the rapid development of flexible electronics and soft robotics, there is an emerging topic of preventing fracture in materials and devices integrated on largely bending film substrates of >100 mu m thickness. The high demand for strategically reducing strain in bending materials requires a facile method that enables one to accurately and precisely analyze the surface bending strain in a wide variety of materials. This study proposes the surface-labeled grating method that is the fundamental and efficient technique for measuring surface bending strains merely by labeling a thin, soft grating onto various film substrates composed of flexible polymeric and rigid inorganic materials. The surface strain with a single-nanoscale (<1.0 nm) can be quantified in real time with no need of material information such as Poisson's ratio, Young's modulus, and film thickness. The fracture limit of a hard coating overlying flexible substrates is successfully determined by the accurate and precise quantification of surface bending strains. Furthermore, a multilayer film substrate with surface bending strain reduced by 50% prevents fractures of hard coatings and organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) since the strains remain below the fracture limit under large bending.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据