4.5 Article

A qualitative descriptive inquiry into factors influencing early weaning and breastfeeding duration among first-time mothers in Papua New Guinea's rural eastern highlands

期刊

WOMEN AND BIRTH
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 E68-E74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.006

关键词

Breastfeeding; Weaning; First-time mothers; Infant feeding practice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a qualitative descriptive approach to explore factors influencing early weaning and breastfeeding duration among first-time mothers in rural Papua New Guinea. The study identified social networks, maternal factors, and lack of fathers' involvement as key factors influencing breastfeeding practices.
Background: Exclusive breastfeeding confers multiple maternal and child health benefits. Although breastfeeding initiation following birth is common in Papua New Guinea, many first-time mothers may not achieve optimal breastfeeding duration. Aim: This study aims to explore and describe factors influencing early weaning and breastfeeding duration among first-time mothers in Papua New Guinea's rural eastern highlands. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted in this study. Data were collected through semistructured in-depth interviews with 20 first-time mothers. The interviews transcripts were then thematically analysed. Results: Three key themes identified were: source of breastfeeding information and support; social networks and breastfeeding communication; and balancing perceived gender and maternal roles. The study further identified a lack of fathers' involvement in supporting breastfeeding. Conclusion: Social and relational networks, and maternal factors need to be considered to better understand breastfeeding practices. Efforts to achieve optimal breastfeeding outcomes entail targeted and culturally appropriate programs, including fathers' involvement as they play important roles in breastfeeding and infant feeding practices. (C) 2021 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据