4.7 Article

Knockout serotonin transporter in rats moderates outcome and stimulus generalization

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01162-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201606140039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study, it was discovered that 5-HTT KO rats processed visual information faster than WT rats during outcome generalization, while showing less ability to update changes in information during stimulus generalization. This suggests that KO 5-HTT modulates information processing when the environment changes.
Understanding the common dimension of mental disorders (such as anxiety, depression, and drug addiction) might contribute to the construction of biological frameworks (Research Domain Criteria, RDoC) for novel ways of treatment. One common dimension at the behavioral level observed across these disorders is a generalization. Testing generalization in serotonin transporter (5-HTT) knockout (KO) rats, an animal model showing depression/anxiety-like behaviors and drug addiction-like behaviors, could therefore provide more insights into this framework. We tested the outcome and stimulus generalization in wild-type (WT) and 5-HTT KO rats. Using a newly established touchscreen-based task, subjects directly responded to visual stimuli (Gabor patch images). We measured the response time and outcome in a precise manner. We found that 5-HTT KO rats processed visual information faster than WT rats during outcome generalization. Interestingly, during stimulus generalization, WT rats gradually responded faster to the stimuli as the sessions progressed, while 5-HTT KO rats responded faster than WT in the initial sessions and did not change significantly as the sessions progressed. This observation suggests that KO rats, compared to WT rats, may be less able to update changes in information. Taken together, KO 5-HTT modulates information processing when the environment changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据