4.5 Article

Controlling Safety of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in Healthcare

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13010102

关键词

artificial intelligence; human– AI interaction; human factors; safety challenges; black-box challenge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aimed to develop a safety controlling system (SCS) framework to reduce the risk of potential healthcare-related incidents by adopting the multi-attribute value model approach. The framework represents a set of attributes and can be used as a checklist in healthcare institutions using AI models, leading to safe application of AI models.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems have achieved significant success in healthcare since 2016, and AI models have accomplished medical tasks, at or above the performance levels of humans. Despite these achievements, various challenges exist in the application of AI in healthcare. One of the main challenges is safety, which is related to unsafe and incorrect actions and recommendations by AI algorithms. In response to the need to address the safety challenges, this research aimed to develop a safety controlling system (SCS) framework to reduce the risk of potential healthcare-related incidents. The framework was developed by adopting the multi-attribute value model approach (MAVT), which comprises four symmetrical parts: extracting attributes, generating weights for the attributes, developing a rating scale, and finalizing the system. The framework represents a set of attributes in different layers and can be used as a checklist in healthcare institutions with implemented AI models. Having these attributes in healthcare systems will lead to high scores in the SCS, which indicates safe application of AI models. The proposed framework provides a basis for implementing and monitoring safety legislation, identifying the risks in AI models' activities, improving human-AI interactions, preventing incidents from occurring, and having an emergency plan for remaining risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据