期刊
SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -出版社
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13010314
关键词
circular economy; sustainability indicators; triple bottom line; trade-offs; decision support; early development stages; business process
资金
- NordForsk
- Nordic Energy Research
- Nordic Innovation under the Nordic Green Growth Research and Innovation Programme [83144]
Integrating sustainability criteria from a triple bottom line perspective presents a challenge for manufacturing actors, with trade-offs being common but existing approaches for sustainability measurements lacking adequate support for trade-off dialogue and decision-making. Acknowledging trade-offs and utilizing a structured approach can help in making trade-offs explicit and supporting decision-making in a transparent manner.
Integration of sustainability criteria from a triple bottom line perspective is considered a challenge for manufacturing actors, who are engaged in developing sustainability-oriented initiatives. The earlier in the development process the criteria are integrated and sustainability potential is evaluated, the more opportunities exist to introduce improvements and select an initiative with a highest sustainability potential. The challenge does not only lie in understanding what sustainability criteria to use to assess sustainability performance, but in managing conflicting results, known as trade-offs. Trade-offs are situations characterized by conflicts between the desired objectives, where it is impossible to satisfy all criteria simultaneously. Although sustainability trade-offs are common, there is a gap in the existing approaches for sustainability measurements to support trade-off dialogue and decision-making. If trade-offs are not acknowledged, there is a risk of accepting an initiative leading to sub-optimizations or higher impacts. Therefore, this study proposes a framework to support trade-off analysis in the early development stages of sustainability-oriented initiatives. The trade-off navigation framework relies on input data and a structured guidance, with the twofold objective: (i) help making trade-offs explicit, and (ii) provide a structured approach to support trade-off analysis and acceptability in a transparent manner. The purpose is to encourage a dynamic decision process and reinforce the knowledge of decision-makers about potential risks and opportunities behind their choices. Using a case of a product development involving CE principles, this paper discusses how a trade-off navigation framework was applied and evaluated by industrial and academic experts, leading to its improvement and identification of strengths and limitations.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据