4.6 Review

Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture-Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13020528

关键词

sustainable agriculture; sustainability governance; sustainability transitions; regime change; niche developments; upscaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a widely acknowledged need for fundamental changes in human interaction with nature to achieve sustainable development. Agriculture plays a key role in this pursuit, both as a major driver and a major threat to global sustainability. Studies have shown a focus on analyzing current agricultural practices, reasons for lock-in, exploring potential transition pathways and governance, predominantly looking at niche developments and discussing governance options for upscaling rather than actual regime change.
The need for fundamental changes in the way humans interact with nature is now widely acknowledged in order to achieve sustainable development. Agriculture figures prominently in this quest, being both a major driver and a major threat to global sustainability. Agricultural systems typically have co-evolved with other societal structures-retailers, land management, technology, consumer habits, and environmental and agricultural law-and can therefore well be described as socio-technical regimes in the sense of the sustainability transitions literature. This paper aims to give an overview of the emerging field of governing transitions to sustainability agriculture and the topics and trends covered, focusing on how agricultural transitions are being governed through a variety of actors and at a variety of levels. We conduct a systematic review of 153 articles published before the year 2019. We identify two main perspectives: papers that analyse the status quo in farming practices and reasons for lock-in, and papers that explore potential transition pathways and their governance. Predominantly, papers study (local) niche developments and discuss governance options for upscaling, rather than actual regime change. Seven distinct perspectives emerge from our reading of the selected articles: application of theoretical perspectives from the literature on socio-technical transitions; governance and regulation; knowledge and learning; concrete approaches to reduce the environmental impact of agricultural systems; urbanisation, urban agriculture, and local food networks; the role of agri-food businesses; as well as the role of gender. While a variety of local case studies shows potential for small-scale changes that might be transferable to other regions and higher levels of governance, it generally appears that more integrative, comparative work and perhaps more coherence in conceptual approaches would benefit the currently highly fragmented field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据