4.6 Article

An Evaluation on Wind Energy Potential Using Multi-Objective Optimization Based Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13010410

关键词

dominating and non-dominated sorting; genetic algorithm; multi-objective optimization (MOO); single-objective optimization; wind energy system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new Multi-Objective Optimization based genetic algorithm model was proposed for wind energy system, which showed superior performance in maximizing power output and minimizing energy cost. The algorithm was analyzed in MATLAB/Simulink platform, demonstrating higher turbine power output.
Wind energy is an abundant renewable energy resource that has been extensively used worldwide in recent years. The present work proposes a new Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) based genetic algorithm (GA) model for a wind energy system. The proposed algorithm consists of non-dominated sorting which focuses to maximize the power extraction of the wind turbine, minimize the cost of generating energy, and the lifetime of the battery. Additionally, the performance characteristics of the wind turbine and battery energy storage system (BESS) are analyzed specifically torque, current, voltage, state of charge (SOC), and internal resistance. The complete analysis is carried out in the MATLAB/Simulink platform. The simulated results are compared with existing optimization techniques such as single-objective, multi-objective, and non-dominating sorting GA II (Genetic Algorithm-II). From the observed results, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA III) optimization algorithm offers superior performance notably higher turbine power output with higher torque rate, lower speed variation, reduced energy cost, and lesser degradation rate of the battery. This result attested to the fact that the proposed optimization tool can extract a higher rate of power from a self-excited induction generator (SEIG) when compared with a conventional optimization tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据