4.6 Article

Ecosystem Services of Urban Agriculture: Perceptions of Project Leaders, Stakeholders and the General Public

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su122410446

关键词

ES valuation; urban food system; urban sustainability; urban farm; urban food supply; multifunctionality; natural capital

资金

  1. European Union [708672, CE-SFS-24-2019, 862663]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [AR1121/1-2]
  3. Operational Programme Research, Development and Education of the Czech Republic [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007435]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [708672] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the scholarly debate, Urban Agriculture (UA) has been widely acknowledged to provide diverse environmental and socio-cultural ecosystem services (ESs) for cities. However, the question of whether these potential benefits are also recognized as such by the involved societal groups on the ground has not yet been investigated. This paper aims at (1) assessing the perceived ESs of UA, comparing the views of different societal groups in the city of Bologna, Italy (namely: UA project leaders, stakeholders and the general public) and (2) to identify differences in the evaluation of specific UA types (indoor farming, high-tech greenhouses, peri-urban farms, community-supported agriculture, community rooftop garden and urban co-op). In total, 406 individuals evaluated 25 ESs via a standardized Likert-scale survey. The study unveiled similarities and divergences of perceptions among the different societal groups. The statistical analysis indicated that the general public and UA stakeholders agree on the high relevance of socio-cultural ESs, while provisioning ESs was considered as less significant. UA types focusing on social innovation were expected to provide higher socio-cultural ESs whereas peri-urban activities were more closely linked to habitat ESs. We assume that involvement and knowledge of UA are determining factors for valuing the provision of ESs through UA, which needs to be considered for ES valuation, particularly in a policymaking context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据