4.6 Article

Environmental Trade-Offs of Downcycling in Circular Economy: Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Material Circularity Indicator to Inform Circularity Strategies for Alkaline Batteries

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031040

关键词

circularity; material circularity indicator; life cycle assessment; trade-offs; alkaline batteries

资金

  1. University of Waterloo
  2. University of Bordeaux under International Doctoral School in Functional Materials (IDS-FunMat)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the application of circularity strategies in improving resource use and recovery and their potential impact on the environment, evaluating their effectiveness through a combination of MCI and LCA methods. The research shows that improving circularity generally reduces environmental impacts, but the results vary significantly among different scenarios. It discusses the design and scope of MCI use and its combination with LCA, drawing on the opportunities of the new comparative approach based on observations from a case study.
The application of circularity strategies to improve resource use and recovery should be considered with their potential impacts on the environment. Their effectiveness could be evaluated by combining the material circularity indicator (MCI) and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods. Environmental trade-offs may be underestimated for some strategies given that the loss of material quality with recycling has not been captured within the methodological framework of MCI. The current study demonstrates how significantly this limitation may influence the trade-offs in a case study. The methods are applied to several scenarios for the circularity improvement of alkaline batteries. The joint interpretation of MCI and LCA scores is carried out using waterfall charts and normalized indicator scores. Results suggest that improving circularity generally reduces environmental impacts, although there is large variability among two sets of values. For example, an increase of MCI score by 14% for two recycling scenarios translates to a small reduction of impacts in one case (0.06-1.64%) and a large reduction in another (9.84-56.82%). Observations from the case study are used to discuss the design and scope of MCI use and its combining with LCA. Lastly, we draw on the opportunities of the new comparative approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据