4.8 Article

Super-Planckian near-field heat transfer between hyperbolic metamaterials

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105264

关键词

Near-field heat transfer; Hyperbolic metamaterial; Silicon nanowires; Evanescent waves; Thermophotonics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61775195]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR15F050001, LZ17A040001]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0205700]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology [AoE/P-02/12, 2017YFB0406000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat transfer between closely-spaced objects may be greatly enhanced with efficiency far beyond than the classic blackbody radiation limit under the participation of evanescent waves. Metamaterials with high density of optical surface states have been particularly explored to improve the heat flux upper limit but mostly confined in theoretical discussions due to the experimental challenges. In the near-field context, the effective medium theory (EMT) as widely used in the discussions is also lack of practical inspections. In this work, we managed to fabricate two 2 x 2 cm(2) sized high-quality infrared hyperbolic metamaterials made of silicon nanorod array and studied their near-field thermophotonic interaction using home-made setup. At the 500 nm vacuum gap, a strong heat flux density of 830 W/m(2) is observed, which is 4.7 times larger than the blackbody value. A local uniaxial model with parameters retrieved from the full-wave simulation was built to reproduce the measured results, which unambiguously validated the widely-adopted semi-empirical condition on the relationship between vacuum gap and lattice constant for the application of the EMT in the near-field regime. These results are believed essential for the future development of metamaterials for novel thermophotonic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据