3.9 Article

Participatory analysis of sustainable land and water management practices for integrated rural development in Myanmar

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2020.166

关键词

erosion; expert participation; public engagement; soil and water bioengineering; water harvesting; Water Safety Plans

资金

  1. Italian Development Cooperation Agency (AICS) [10942/tdh/myanmar]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the need for sustainable water management practices in rural areas of Myanmar, emphasizing the importance of water safety plans, water harvesting, and soil and water bioengineering. It also calls for improvements in water sanitation in the poorest regions to support equitable development.
Besides providing reliable water resources for agricultural production, rural development efforts in Myanmar should target rural water security in terms of safe water supply and sanitation, and by mitigating water-related hazards. However, very few studies are available over the status of water-related development in rural areas of the country, and consequently on suitable practical solutions. The present paper describes a participatory workshop undertaken involving 45 rural development officers of the Department of Rural Development (DRD) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation (MOALI), aimed at identifying suitable sustainable land and water management (SLWM) practices to be developed in rural areas of the country. Adoption of water safety plans (WSP), water harvesting, and soil and water bioengineering were strongly supported, while the need for improving water sanitation, especially in the poorest areas, was made evident. Insights of the participatory process confirmed that the poorest regions of Myanmar have also the worst water management structures. The results of the present work can represent baseline information and a needs assessment for future development projects in the country. However, there is a strong need for more studies and reports targeting marginalized rural contexts of Myanmar, to support equitable development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据