4.5 Review

Effects of interrupting prolonged sitting on postprandial glycemia and insulin responses: A network meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 419-429

出版社

SHANGHAI UNIV SPORT
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.12.006

关键词

Glucose; Insulin; Physical activity interruption; Prolonged sitting; Meta-analytic review

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFC2003301, 2020YFC2007005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703252]
  3. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology of China [19080503000]
  4. Public Welfare Technology Project of the Zhejiang Science Department [LGF18H170006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replacing prolonged sitting with moderate-intensity physical activity interruptions has a positive effect on reducing postprandial glycemia and insulin responses, with moderate-intensity interruptions being the optimal intervention strategy.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity (PA) interrupting prolonged sitting (PS) on postprandial glycemia and insulin responses among adults. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched through September 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of all forms of PA interrupting PS on postprandial glycemia and/or insulin responses among adults without chronic diseases were included in this study. The risk of bias of included studies was evaluated based on the Cochrane tool. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate the summary standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) with random effects. Results: Thirty crossover RCTs were included in our review. These RCTs included 9 types of interventions that interrupted PS. When compared to PS by itself, light-intensity PA intermittent interrupting (LPA-INT) PS and moderate-intensity PA intermittent interrupting (MPA-INT) PS significantly lowered postprandial glycemia (SMD = -0.46, 95%CI: -0.70 to -0.21; SMD = -0.69, 95%CI: - 1.00 to -0.37, respectively) and significantly reduced postprandial insulin response (SMD = -0.46, 95%CI: -0.66 to - 0.26; SMD =-0.47, 95%CI: -0.77 to -0.17, respectively). Results of the clustered ranking plot indicated that MPA-INT was the most effective intervention in lowering postprandial glycemia and insulin responses. Conclusion: Replacing PS with MPA-INT or LPA-INT has a positive effect in reducing postprandial glycemia and insulin responses, with MPA-INT being the optimal intervention strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据