4.8 Article

Eco-evolutionary partitioning metrics: assessing the importance of ecological and evolutionary contributions to population and community change

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 839-853

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12632

关键词

Community ecology; eco-evolutionary dynamics; eco-evolutionary partitioning metrics; norms of reaction; Price equation; trait change

类别

资金

  1. KU Leuven Research Fund [PF/2010/07]
  2. Belspo IUAP project SPEEDY
  3. KU Leuven Research Fund F+ fellowship [F+ 13036]
  4. IWT PhD fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interest in eco-evolutionary dynamics is rapidly increasing thanks to ground-breaking research indicating that evolution can occur rapidly and can alter the outcome of ecological processes. A key challenge in this sub-discipline is establishing how important the contribution of evolutionary and ecological processes and their interactions are to observed shifts in population and community characteristics. Although a variety of metrics to separate and quantify the effects of evolutionary and ecological contributions to observed trait changes have been used, they often allocate fractions of observed changes to ecology and evolution in different ways. We used a mathematical and numerical comparison of two commonly used frameworks - the Price equationand reaction norms - to reveal that the Price equationcannot partition genetic from non-genetic trait change within lineages, whereas the reaction norm approach cannot partition among- from within-lineage trait change. We developed a new metric that combines the strengths of both Price-based and reaction norm metrics, extended all metrics to analyse community change and also incorporated extinction and colonisation of species in these metrics. Depending on whether our new metric is applied to populations or communities, it can correctly separate intraspecific, interspecific, evolutionary, non-evolutionary and interacting eco-evolutionary contributions to trait change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据