4.0 Article

Self-reported helpfulness of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) for hoarding disorder

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2021.100622

关键词

Hoarding disorder; Treatment evaluation; Exposure therapy; Cognitive training

资金

  1. Clinical Science Research and Development Program of the Veterans Health Administration [CSRD-068-10S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CREST is an effective treatment for hoarding disorder that combines exposure for sorting and cognitive training, with participants finding therapists to be the most helpful aspect of treatment.
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) is a promising treatment for hoarding disorder (HD) that incorporates exposure for sorting with compensatory cognitive training (CCT) tailored to reduce cognitive difficulties associated with hoarding. A randomized controlled trial of CREST found it to be favorable to case management for reducing hoarding symptoms and improving executive functioning. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate participant feedback about CREST and the perceived helpfulness of each aspect of treatment: individual CCT skills, exposure, and relapse prevention. We evaluated quantitative and qualitative data from 21 older adults who completed CREST. Most CREST modules were rated as being quite a bit helpful. The modules with the highest helpfulness ratings were using a calendar, making to-do lists, and practicing sorting. Higher helpfulness ratings of practicing sorting and using a calendar were associated with greater decreases in functional limitations at post-treatment. Participants commonly identified their therapist as the most helpful aspect of treatment, assessments as the least helpful, and expressed CREST could be improved upon with additional relapse prevention and/or aftercare. Our results suggest that in addition to being efficacious, CREST is perceived to be a highly useful treatment by older adults with HD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据