4.8 Article

Evolutionary response when selection and genetic variation covary across environments

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 1189-1200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12662

关键词

Anthropogenic change; breeder's equation; cryptic genetic variation; environmental heterogeneity; heritability; novel environments; response to selection

类别

资金

  1. Jefferson Scholars Foundation
  2. NSF [NSF-IOS-1027251, NSF-IOS-1355003]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1355003] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although models of evolution usually assume that the strength of selection on a trait and the expression of genetic variation in that trait are independent, whenever the same ecological factor impacts both parameters, a correlation between the two may arise that accelerates trait evolution in some environments and slows it in others. Here, we address the evolutionary consequences and ecological causes of a correlation between selection and expressed genetic variation. Using a simple analytical model, we show that the correlation has a modest effect on the mean evolutionary response and a large effect on its variance, increasing among-population or among-generation variation in the response when positive, and diminishing variation when negative. We performed a literature review to identify the ecological factors that influence selection and expressed genetic variation across traits. We found that some factors - temperature and competition - are unlikely to generate the correlation because they affected one parameter more than the other, and identified others - most notably, environmental novelty - that merit further investigation because little is known about their impact on one of the two parameters. We argue that the correlation between selection and genetic variation deserves attention alongside other factors that promote or constrain evolution in heterogeneous landscapes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据