4.8 Article

Costs of fear: behavioural and life-history responses to risk and their demographic consequences vary across species

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 403-413

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12573

关键词

Anti-predator; behaviour; birds; demographic cost; dependent offspring; development; growth; life history; predation; reproductive success

类别

资金

  1. Bair Foundation
  2. Lewis and Clark National Forest
  3. US Geological Survey Climate Change Research Program
  4. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [FP-91747701-0]
  5. University of Montana IACUC protocol [AUP 059-10]
  6. Montana Fish Wildlife Parks [2009-023, 2010-044, 2011-045, 2012-042, 2013-090, 2014-084]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1241041] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1349178] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioural responses to reduce predation risk might cause demographic costs of fear'. Costs differ among species, but a conceptual framework to understand this variation is lacking. We use a life-history framework to tie together diverse traits and life stages to better understand interspecific variation in responses and costs. We used natural and experimental variation in predation risk to test phenotypic responses and associated demographic costs for 10 songbird species. Responses such as increased parental attentiveness yielded reduced development time and created benefits such as reduced predation probability. Yet, responses to increased risk also created demographic costs by reducing offspring production in the absence of direct predation. This cost of fear varied widely across species, but predictably with the probability of repeat breeding. Use of a life-history framework can aid our understanding of potential demographic costs from predation, both from responses to perceived risk and from direct predation mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据