4.3 Article

Synergistic antifungal activity of mixtures of clove, cumin and caraway essential oils and their major active components

期刊

JOURNAL OF HERBAL MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100399

关键词

Aspergillusniger; Candidaalbicans; Carvone; Cuminaldehyde; Eugenol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing resistance of microbes to available antifungals has necessitated a search for alternative natural products with antifungal properties. Combinations of essential oils (EOs) with known antifungal activities may increase antimicrobial activity, reduce side effects, and overcome resistance. This study determined the anti-fungal activity of basil, marjoram, clove, cumin and caraway EOs, both individually and in combination. The EOs and the major constituents of clove, cumin and caraway were screened against Candida albicans (C. albicans), and Aspergillus niger (A. niger) using a broth dilution method. Fluconazole was used as a positive control. The MICs of the mixtures of EOs were better than those of the single oils (except in the case of clove oil) especially against C. albicans (1 mg/ml) suggesting a synergistic effect against both C. albicans and A. niger (2 mg/ml) when increasing the concentration of one oil over the other two. Single active components (eugenol, carvone and cuminaldehyde) have better activity than single total oils against both organisms and showed synergistic effects when combined. In summary, mixtures of EOs or their active components had similar/better antifungal activities compared to the single oils or ingredients suggesting a synergistic effect against both C. albicans and A. niger. Clove oil was the best against both organisms while eugenol was the best against A. niger. In conclusion, the synergistic effect of the combinations of the EOs and their active components against C. albicans and A. niger could lead to decreased side effects and consequently they can be used to treat various fungal infections caused by these organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据