4.7 Article

An Insurance Contract Design to Boost Storage Participation in the Electricity Market

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 543-552

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.3011052

关键词

Contracts; Insurance; Production; Generators; Energy storage; Electricity supply industry; Uncertainty; Energy storage; renewable energy; electricity market; decision-making; contract design

资金

  1. NSF [CNS-1739295]
  2. Sandia National Lab [PO 2079716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an insurance contract to compensate energy storage systems for providing flexibility and incentivize higher renewable participation in the electricity mix. The contract encourages renewable producers to bid higher and provides an additional source of revenue for storage owners.
Energy storage technologies are key to improving grid flexibility in the presence of increasing amounts of intermittent renewable generation. We propose an insurance contract that suitably compensates energy storage systems for providing flexibility. Such a contract provides a wider range of market opportunities for these systems while also incentivizing higher renewable penetration in the grid. We consider a day-ahead market in which generators, including renewables and storage owners, bid to be scheduled for the next operating day. Due to production uncertainty, renewable generators may be unable to meet their day-ahead production schedule, and thus be subject to a penalty. As a hedge against these penalties, we propose an insurance contract between a renewable producer and a storage owner, in which the storage reserves some energy to be used in case of renewable shortfalls. We show that such a contract incentivizes the renewable player to bid higher, thus increasing renewable participation in the electricity mix. It also provides an extra source of revenue for storage owners that may not be profitable with a purely arbitrage-based strategy in the day-ahead market. We validate our analysis through two case studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据