4.6 Article

Adaptive Cooperative Control With Guaranteed Convergence in Time-Varying Networks of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 50, 期 12, 页码 5035-5046

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2916563

关键词

Nonlinear agents; Nussbaum-type function; time-varying topologies; unknown control directions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1713209, 61520106009, 61533008]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242017K41055]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we investigate the adaptive cooperative control problem with guaranteed convergence for a class of nonlinear multiagent systems with unknown control directions and time-varying topologies. A key lemma is first derived which involves dynamically changing interaction topologies, and then a new kind of distributed control algorithms with Nussbaum-type functions are proposed based on this lemma. It is proven that if the topologies are time varying with integral weight uniform upper bound and reciprocity, then convergence is guaranteed with the proposed algorithms for nonlinear multiagent systems with nonidentical unknown control directions. An important feature of this paper is that, under time-varying topologies, the designed algorithms can deal with nonidentical unknown control directions by using classical Nussbaum-type functions. Moreover, with the proposed algorithms, we extend the adaptive cooperative control results to the case of delta-connected graphs. In particular, the adaptive leaderless consensus of high-order nonlinear agents with nonidentical unknown control directions and a directed graph having a spanning tree is also tackled as a special case. Finally, theoretical results are illustrated by a group of Genesio-Tesi systems with distributed control algorithms under time-varying topologies and some special network topologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据