4.6 Article

Responses to the Hydrostatic Pressure of Surface and Subsurface Strains of Pseudothermotoga elfii Revealing the Piezophilic Nature of the Strain Originating From an Oil-Producing Well

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.588771

关键词

oil-reservoir; hydrostatic pressure; piezophile; chained cells; Pseudothermotoga; thermophilic anaerobes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microorganisms living in deep-oil reservoirs face extreme conditions of elevated temperature and hydrostatic pressure. Within these microbial communities, members of the order Thermotogales are predominant. Among them, the genus Pseudothermotoga is widespread in oilfield-produced waters. The growth and cell phenotypes under hydrostatic pressures ranging from 0.1 to 50 MPa of two strains from the same species originating from subsurface, Pseudothermotoga elfii DSM9442 isolated from a deep African oil-producing well, and surface, P. elfii subsp. lettingae isolated from a thermophilic sulfate-reducing bioreactor, environments are reported for the first time. The data support evidence for the piezophilic nature of P. elfii DSM9442, with an optimal hydrostatic pressure for growth of 20 MPa and an upper limit of 40 MPa, and the piezotolerance of P. elfii subsp. lettingae with growth occurring up to 20 MPa only. Under the experimental conditions, both strains produce mostly acetate and propionate as volatile fatty acids with slight variations with respect to the hydrostatic pressure for P. elfii DSM9442. The data show that the metabolism of P. elfii DSM9442 is optimized when grown at 20 MPa, in agreement with its piezophilic nature. Both Pseudothermotoga strains form chained cells when the hydrostatic pressure increases, especially P. elfii DSM9442 for which 44% of cells is chained when grown at 40 MPa. The viability of the chained cells increases with the increase in the hydrostatic pressure, indicating that chain formation is a protective mechanism for P. elfii DSM9442.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据