4.8 Article

Asymmetric random walks reveal that the chemotaxis network modulates flagellar rotational bias in Helicobacter pylori

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63936

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP170805, RR200043]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM123085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemotaxis network in Helicobacter pylori regulates the direction of rotation in the bacterial flagellar motor to facilitate cell migration towards favorable chemical environments. This modulation results in cells swimming faster or slower depending on the direction of flagellar rotation. Exposure to a chemo-attractant decreases the rotational bias, leading to cells swimming exclusively in the faster mode, while the absence of the chemotaxis protein CheY results in a zero bias. The relationship between reversal frequency and rotational bias is unimodal in this species.
The canonical chemotaxis network modulates the bias for a particular direction of rotation in the bacterial flagellar motor to help the cell migrate toward favorable chemical environments. How the chemotaxis network in Helicobacter pylori modulates flagellar functions is unknown, which limits our understanding of chemotaxis in this species. Here, we determined that H. pylori swim faster (slower) whenever their flagella rotate counterclockwise (clockwise) by analyzing their hydrodynamic interactions with bounding surfaces. This asymmetry in swimming helped quantify the rotational bias. Upon exposure to a chemo-attractant, the bias decreased and the cells tended to swim exclusively in the faster mode. In the absence of a key chemotaxis protein, CheY, the bias was zero. The relationship between the reversal frequency and the rotational bias was unimodal. Thus, H. pylori's chemotaxis network appears to modulate the probability of clockwise rotation in otherwise counterclockwise-rotating flagella, similar to the canonical network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据