4.8 Article

Oxytocin modulates human chemosensory decoding of sex in a dose-dependent manner

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59376

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31830037, 31422023, QYZDB-SSW-SMC055, XDB32010200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study provides evidence of the role of oxytocin and vasopressin in subconscious chemosignaling in humans. It shows that chemosensory communications of masculinity and femininity can be blocked by a competitive antagonist of these neuropeptides. Oxytocin modulates the decoding of sex-specific information in a manner that is dose-dependent, nonmonotonic, and contingent upon social proficiency of the recipients.
There has been accumulating evidence of human social chemo-signaling, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Considering the evolutionarily conserved roles of oxytocin and vasopressin in reproductive and social behaviors, we examined whether the two neuropeptides are involved in the subconscious processing of androsta-4,16,-dien-3-one and estra-1,3,5 (10),16-tetraen-3-ol, two human chemosignals that convey masculinity and femininity to the targeted recipients, respectively. Psychophysical data collected from 216 heterosexual and homosexual men across five experiments totaling 1056 testing sessions consistently showed that such chemosensory communications of masculinity and femininity were blocked by a competitive antagonist of both oxytocin and vasopressin receptors called atosiban, administered nasally. On the other hand, intranasal oxytocin, but not vasopressin, modulated the decoding of androstadienone and estratetraenol in manners that were dose-dependent, nonmonotonic, and contingent upon the recipients' social proficiency. Taken together, these findings establish a causal link between neuroendocrine factors and subconscious chemosensory communications of sex-specific information in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据