4.6 Article

Pre-Lithiating SiO Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries by a Simple, Effective, and Controllable Strategy Using Stabilized Lithium Metal Powder

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 648-657

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05851

关键词

initial Coulombic efficiency; lithium-ion battery; pre-lithiation; silicon monoxide; stabilized lithium metal powder

资金

  1. Science AMP
  2. Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19DZ2270100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The researchers proposed a simple and effective pre-lithiation strategy using SST as a relatively stable pre-lithiation reagent to improve SiO anodes, successfully adjusting ICE to 60-120%. Pre-lithiation is considered as an important way to improve ICE and reduce lithium loss.
Silicon monoxide (SiO) materials have received focus as lithium-ion battery anode materials. SiO undergoes smaller volume changes during the charge (delithiation) and discharge (lithiation) processes compared with pure silicon. However, its low initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) restricts its practical application, resulting from the formation of solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer by irreversible reactions between the active materials, lithium ions, and fluoride in the electrolyte during the first discharge (lithiation) process. Pre-lithiation is recognized to be the most immediate and effective way to increase the ICE and reduce the loss of lithium. Researchers are currently trying to find simple methods to control the degree of prelithiation. Here, a simple and effective pre-lithiation strategy to improve the SiO anodes is presented using stabilized lithium metal powder (SLMP), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), and toluene, which can be abbreviated as SST, as a relatively stable pre-lithiation reagent. The degree of pre-lithiation was used to adjust the ICE to 60-120%, because the ICE had a nearly linear relationship with the amount of SST. Meanwhile, the efficiency of SLMP utilization was also calculated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据