4.6 Article

Enhanced Water Harvesting System and Mechanical Performance from Janus Fibers with Polystyrene and Cellulose Acetate

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 180-188

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06480

关键词

electrospinning; Janus system; side-by-side fibers; fog collection; water harvesting contact angle; wetting

资金

  1. SONATA BIS 5 project by the National Science Centre in Poland [2015/18/E/ST5/00230]
  2. European Union [POWR.03.05.00-00-Z307/17-00]
  3. Macromolecular Chemistry group-University of Bayreuth
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully utilized electrospun fibers as fog water collectors, creating a PS-CA Janus structure that proved more effective in collecting fog water compared to traditional mesh and single fibers, with higher tensile strength and stability.
Water resources are shrinking year by year, and fog water collectors (FWCs) are already being used in humid regions, where populations have limited access to traditional water resources. The aim of this study was to use electrospun fibers as FWCs to collect water. Two polymers with different wetting and mechanical properties were successfully combined to create a Janus structure from hydrophobic polystyrene (PS) and hydrophilic cellulose acetate (CA). These fibers, with a specially designed gutter shape, were electrospun using a side-nozzle system. The resulting side-by-side PS-CA fiber meshes proved to be a more effective system for fog collection under controlled laboratory conditions than either commercially available Raschel mesh or PS and CA fibers alone. The efficiency of Janus PS-CA fiber mesh achieved a rate of 71 mg.cm(-2).h(-)(1). The reinforcement of PS with CA made it possible to obtain durable and mechanically stable PS-CA meshes with higher tensile strength than PS or CA fiber mesh alone. These new PS-CA Janus fibers proved to be a robust and highly efficient system for water harvesting applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据