4.6 Article

Flood Susceptibility Assessment Using Novel Ensemble of Hyperpipes and Support Vector Regression Algorithms

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13020241

关键词

flood susceptibility assessment; Koiya River basin; hyperpipes (HP); support vector regression (SVR); ensemble approach

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the Doctoral College GIScience at the University of Salzburg [DKW 1237-N23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the prediction performance of flood susceptibility (FS) mapping in the Koiya River basin, Eastern India, using ensemble approach of hyperpipes (HP) and support vector regression (SVR) machine learning algorithms. The research found that the ensemble approach of HP-SVR was the most optimal model in FS assessment, followed by HP and SVR standalone ML algorithms.
Recurrent floods are one of the major global threats among people, particularly in developing countries like India, as this nation has a tropical monsoon type of climate. Therefore, flood susceptibility (FS) mapping is indeed necessary to overcome this type of natural hazard phenomena. With this in mind, we evaluated the prediction performance of FS mapping in the Koiya River basin, Eastern India. The present research work was done through preparation of a sophisticated flood inventory map; eight flood conditioning variables were selected based on the topography and hydro-climatological condition, and by applying the novel ensemble approach of hyperpipes (HP) and support vector regression (SVR) machine learning (ML) algorithms. The ensemble approach of HP-SVR was also compared with the stand-alone ML algorithms of HP and SVR. In relative importance of variables, distance to river was the most dominant factor for flood occurrences followed by rainfall, land use land cover (LULC), and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The validation and accuracy assessment of FS maps was done through five popular statistical methods. The result of accuracy evaluation showed that the ensemble approach is the most optimal model (AUC = 0.915, sensitivity = 0.932, specificity = 0.902, accuracy = 0.928 and Kappa = 0.835) in FS assessment, followed by HP (AUC = 0.885) and SVR (AUC = 0.871).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据