4.7 Review

Role of Uremic Toxins in Early Vascular Ageing and Calcification

期刊

TOXINS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13010026

关键词

chronic kidney disease; uremic toxins; vascular calcification; cardiovascular disease; vascular smooth muscle cells

资金

  1. Strategic Research Program in Diabetes at Karolinska Institutet (Swedish Research Council) [2009-1068]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation Program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [722609]
  3. International Network for Training on Risks of Vascular Intimal Calcification and roads to Regression of Cardiovascular Disease (INTRICARE)
  4. Baxter Healthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with advanced CKD, accumulation of uremic toxins affects cellular and organ functions, leading to chronic inflammation, vascular calcification, and other adverse effects, significantly impacting cardiovascular health.
In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the accumulation of uremic toxins, caused by a combination of decreased excretion secondary to reduced kidney function and increased generation secondary to aberrant expression of metabolite genes, interferes with different biological functions of cells and organs, contributing to a state of chronic inflammation and other adverse biologic effects that may cause tissue damage. Several uremic toxins have been implicated in severe vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) changes and other alterations leading to vascular calcification (VC) and early vascular ageing (EVA). The above mentioned are predominant clinical features of patients with CKD, contributing to their exceptionally high cardiovascular mortality. Herein, we present an update on pathophysiological processes and mediators underlying VC and EVA induced by uremic toxins. Moreover, we discuss their clinical impact, and possible therapeutic targets aiming at preventing or ameliorating the harmful effects of uremic toxins on the vasculature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据