4.7 Article

Synergistic Use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 to Map Natural Forest and Acacia Plantation and Stand Ages in North-Central Vietnam

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13020185

关键词

natural forest; acacia plantation; Random Forest; Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR); Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; satellite

资金

  1. Institutional Links grant under the Newton-Vietnam partnership [216372155]
  2. UK Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  3. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/M003574/1]
  4. United Bank of Carbon (UBoC)
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [771492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully distinguished acacia plantations and natural forests using a combination of radar and optical imagery, identifying an effective parameter for distinguishing between them. Additionally, age classification of acacia plantations was conducted using imagery, with lower accuracy observed for older age classes.
Many remote sensing studies do not distinguish between natural and planted forests. We combine C-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (Sentinel-1, S-1) and optical satellite imagery (Sentinel-2, S-2) and examine Random Forest (RF) classification of acacia plantations and natural forest in North-Central Vietnam. We demonstrate an ability to distinguish plantation from natural forest, with overall classification accuracies of 87% for S-1, and 92.5% and 92.3% for S-2 and for S-1 and S-2 combined respectively. We found that the ratio of the Short-Wave Infrared Band to the Red Band proved most effective in distinguishing acacia from natural forest. We used RF on S-2 imagery to classify acacia plantations into 6 age classes with an overall accuracy of 70%, with young plantation consistently separated from older. However, accuracy was lower at distinguishing between the older age classes. For both distinguishing plantation and natural forest, and determining plantation age, a combination of radar and optical imagery did nothing to improve classification accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据