4.7 Article

A Density-Based Algorithm for the Detection of Individual Trees from LiDAR Data

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13020322

关键词

airborne LiDAR data; individual tree identification; tree counting; deciduous forest

资金

  1. Regione Piemonte, Settore Difesa del Suolo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel LiDAR algorithm for accurate individual tree detection in deciduous forests, with low sensitivity to parameter setup and applicability in low-density point cloud analysis. Additionally, the algorithm demonstrates potential for more complex tools in forest modeling and management.
Nowadays, LiDAR is widely used for individual tree detection, usually providing higher accuracy in coniferous stands than in deciduous ones, where the rounded-crown, the presence of understory vegetation, and the random spatial tree distribution may affect the identification algorithms. In this work, we propose a novel algorithm that aims to overcome these difficulties and yield the coordinates and the height of the individual trees on the basis of the point density features of the input point cloud. The algorithm was tested on twelve deciduous areas, assessing its performance on both regular-patterned plantations and stands with randomly distributed trees. For all cases, the algorithm provides high accuracy tree count (F-score > 0.7) and satisfying stem locations (position error around 1.0 m). In comparison to other common tools, the algorithm is weakly sensitive to the parameter setup and can be applied with little knowledge of the study site, thus reducing the effort and cost of field campaigns. Furthermore, it demonstrates to require just 2 points center dot m-2 as minimum point density, allowing for the analysis of low-density point clouds. Despite its simplicity, it may set the basis for more complex tools, such as those for crown segmentation or biomass computation, with potential applications in forest modeling and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据