4.6 Article

Linking Large-Eddy Simulations to Local Cloud Observations

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002209

关键词

clouds; heterogeneity; ICON‐ LEM; large‐ scale forcing; LES; remote sensing

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01LK1501, 01LK1502, 01LK1503, 01LK1504, 01LK1505, 01LK1506, 01LK1507, 01LK1508, 01LK1508A, 01LK1509A]
  2. [CHKU28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to enhance our understanding of clouds and their microphysical processes, it is crucial to exploit both observations and models. Local observations from ground-based remote sensing sites provide detailed information on clouds, but as they are limited in dimension, there is no straightforward way to use them to guide large-scale model development. We show that large-eddy simulations (LES) performed on similar temporal and spatial scales as the local observations can bridge this gap. Recently, LES with realistic topography and lateral boundary conditions became feasible for domains spanning several 100 km. In this study, we show how these simulations can be linked to observations of the Julich Observatory for Cloud Evolution (JOYCE) for a 9-day period in spring 2013. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of very large versus small but more constrained domains as well as the differences compared to more idealized setups. The semi-idealized LES include time-varying forcing but are run with homogeneous surfaces and periodic boundary conditions. These assumptions seem to be the reason why they struggle to represent the observed varying conditions. The simulations using the realistic setup are able to represent the general cloud structure (timing, height, phase). It seems that the smaller and more constrained domain allows for a tighter control on the synoptic situation and is the preferred choice to ensure the comparability to the local observations. These simulations together with measures as the shown Hellinger distance will allow us to gain more insights into the representativeness of column measurements in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据