4.3 Article

Factors Associated with the Need for Assistance among the Elderly in Malaysia

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020730

关键词

nursing care; need of assistance; elderly; old age

资金

  1. World Health Organization Centre for Health Development (WHO Kobe Centre-WKC) [2018/863819-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that factors associated with the need for assistance among the elderly in Malaysia include financial difficulties, hearing problems, severe limitations in daily activities over the past 6 months, and specific daily activities such as eating, standing, and walking. Policies should include preventive measures to ensure the sustainability of care for the elderly and promote healthy aging.
The need for assistance among the elderly is rising, which poses challenges for healthcare systems. Thus, this study aims to determine the factors associated with the need for assistance in the daily living activities of Malaysia's elderly population. A total of 1204 elderly individuals, aged 60 years and above, were recruited. An interview was conducted using the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES-BM) questionnaire. Overall, 7.7% of the elderly participants required assistance. A logistic regression model showed that difficult financial statuses (aOR 4.56), hearing difficulties (aOR 1.78), and severe limitations in daily activity over the past 6 months (aOR 11.99) were associated with a higher likelihood of needing assistance. In addition, daily activities such as an inability to feed (aOR 8.46), stand without support (aOR 2.06), or walk for 15 min without stopping (aOR 1.99) were significantly associated with the need for assistance. Factors associated with the need for assistance are health status, disability, and the financial status of the elderly. Preventive measures should be included in policies to ensure the sustainability of the care provided to the elderly in terms of promoting healthy ageing and a good quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据