Acute Effects of Using Added Respiratory Dead Space Volume in a Cycling Sprint Interval Exercise Protocol: A Cross-Over Study

Background: The aim of the study was to compare acute physiological, biochemical, and perceptual responses during sprint interval exercise (SIE) with breathing through a device increasing added respiratory dead space volume (ARDS(V)) and without the device. Methods: The study involved 11 healthy, physically active men (mean maximal oxygen uptake: 52.6 +/- 8.2 mL center dot kg(1)center dot min(-1)). During four visits to a laboratory with a minimum interval of 72 h, they participated in (1) an incremental test on a cycle ergometer; (2) a familiarization session; (3) and (4) cross-over SIE sessions. SIE consisted of 6 x 10-s all-out bouts with 4-min active recovery. During one of the sessions the participants breathed through a 1200-mL ARDSv (SIEARDS). Results: The work performed was significantly higher by 4.4% during SIEARDS, with no differences in the fatigue index. The mean respiratory ventilation was significantly higher by 13.2%, and the mean oxygen uptake was higher by 31.3% during SIEARDS. Respiratory muscle strength did not change after the two SIE sessions. In SIEARDS, the mean pH turned out significantly lower (7.26 vs. 7.29), and the mean HCO3- concentration was higher by 7.6%. Average La- and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) did not differ between the sessions. Conclusions: Using ARDS(V) during SIE provokes respiratory acidosis, causes stronger acute physiological responses, and does not increase RPE.