4.3 Article

Development and Validation of an Online Survey to Assess Perception of Diabetes Risk and Barriers and Facilitators to Weight Loss Following Gestational Diabetes

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020480

关键词

survey development; gestational diabetes; diabetes prevention; content validation; Theoretical Domains Framework

资金

  1. University of South Australia
  2. Research Training Program (RTP) Stipend Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study outlines the development and validation process of a survey investigating barriers to weight loss, perception of diabetes risk, and diet strategies following gestational diabetes. The survey underwent three stages of development: item generation, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. Through expert evaluation and pilot testing, a final survey tool with 30 items was established, achieving content validation.
Our objective was to describe the development and validation of a survey investigating barriers to weight loss, perception of diabetes risk, and views of diet strategies following gestational diabetes (GDM). The survey underwent three stages of development: generation of items, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. A content validation index (CVI) was calculated from expert responses regarding item relevance, coherence, clarity, and response options. Experts also responded to the domain fit of questions linked to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Pilot responders answered the survey and responded to review questions. Six experts in the field of nutrition, midwifery, psychology, or other health or medical research completed the expert review stage of the survey. In the pilot test, there were 20 responders who were women with previous GDM and who were living in Australia. The overall CVI from the expert review was 0.91. All questions except one received an I-CVI of >0.78 for relevance (n = 35). Fourteen of the 27 items linked to the TDF received an agreement ratio of <1.0. Twenty-seven of the 31 pilot questions were completed by >= 90% of responders. Pilot review questions revealed an agreement percentage of >= 86% (n = 12) regarding the survey's ease to complete, understand, importance, length, and interest level. The final survey tool consists of 30 items and achieved content validation through expert evaluation and pilot testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据