4.3 Article

Effects of El Nino/La Nina on the Number of Imported Shigellosis Cases in the Republic of Korea, 2004-2017

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010211

关键词

shigellosis; bacterial dysentery; South Korea; Republic of Korea; El Nino; La Nina; ENSO; IOD; Southeast Asia

资金

  1. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention RD [2018-P1404-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shigellosis is a major diarrheal disease in low- and middle-income countries, and climate fluctuations may affect its incidence in South and Southeast Asian countries. The study found that the El Nino phenomenon affects the relative risk of shigellosis infection, while the La Nina phenomenon increases the risk of infection.
Shigellosis is a major diarrheal disease in low- and middle-income countries. Although the incidence of such diseases in South and Southeast Asia has been associated with climate fluctuations linked to the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the impact of ENSO on shigellosis infections remains unknown. Data reported to being infected with shigellosis while traveling abroad from 2004 to 2017 were obtained from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We investigated the relationship between the Oceanic Nino Index (ONI) and Indian Ocean Dipole Mode Index and the relative risk of shigellosis in outbound travelers using distributed lag linear and non-linear models. From 2004 to 2017, 87.1% of imported shigellosis was infected in South and Southeast Asian countries. The relative risk of imported shigellosis infection in outbound travelers increased as the ONI decreased. In the association with the five-month cumulative ONI, the relative risk of infection continuously increased as the La Nina index gained strength. Climate fluctuations associated with the La Nina phenomenon in South and Southeast Asian countries can lead to issues in sanitation and water safety. Our findings suggest that the decreasing trend in the ONI is associated with an increased incidence of shigellosis in these countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据