4.3 Article

The Effects of Social Networks of the Older Adults with Limited Instrumental Activities of Daily Living on Unmet Medical Needs

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010027

关键词

older adults; social networks; instrumental activities of daily living; unmet medical needs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effects of social networks on unmet medical needs among older adults with limited instrumental activities of daily living in a community setting. It found that factors such as annual household income, participation in social activities, and physical support were predictors of unmet medical needs for male subjects, while factors such as annual household income, number of chronic diseases, living situation, frequency of contacting close friends, and emotional support were predictors for female subjects.
This study was conducted to identify the effects of social networks on unmet medical needs among older adults with limited instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) who live in a community. This study analyzed data from 2281 older adults with limited IADL from the 2017 National Survey of Older Koreans. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, X2 tests, t-tests, and logistic regression analysis. About 73.0% of the subjects were female and 15.8% of the subjects had experienced unmet medical needs. The predictors of unmet medical needs according to gender are as follows: annual household income, participation in social activities, and physical support for male subjects and annual household income, number of chronic diseases, living alone in a household, living with others in a household, frequency of contacting close friends, and emotional support for female subjects. The findings of this study will be utilized as a basis for establishing relevant measures to enable older adults to receive proper medical services by heightening the understanding of the gap between medical service use and the medical needs of older adults with limited IADL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据