4.7 Article

An integrative index of Ecosystem Services provision based on remotely sensed data

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 145-154

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.054

关键词

MODIS; Chaco-pampean plains; South America; C gains; Water losses; Biodiversity

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientificas y Tecnicas (Argentina)
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina)
  3. Fondo para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (Argentina)
  4. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) - US National Science Foundation [CRN III 3095, GEO-1128040]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. ICER [1128040] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an approach to generate estimates and to map Ecosystem Services (ES) related to C and water dynamics (Soil Carbon sequestration, evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge) and biodiversity (Avian Richness) from remotely sensed data in two ecoregions of South America: the Semiarid Chaco woodlands and the Rio de la Plata grasslands. Two attributes of the seasonal dynamics of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI); the annual mean (NDVI mean), an indicator of light interception and hence of total C gains and the intra-annual Coefficient of Variation of the NDVI (NDVI (CV)), a descriptor of seasonality; were combined into an ES provision index (ESPI = NDVImean * (1-NDVICV)). The proportion of the variance in ES provision explained by the ESPI varied from 0.484 for avian richness up to 0.662 for C sequestration. A relatively large proportion of the studied area presented changes in ES provision. A 32,4% of the Semiarid Chaco and the Rio de la Plata grasslands presented significant (p <0.01) trends. Most of the trends (30.2%) were negative, showing a decrease in ESPI. An index like the one proposed here can be used as an aggregated indicator of the status and/or trends of ES supply at large spatial scales (subcontinental in our case). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据