4.3 Article

Screening of 'King' mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour) x Poncirus trifoliata ((L.) Raf.) hybrids as salt stress-tolerant citrus rootstocks

期刊

HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 337-351

出版社

KOREAN SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-020-00291-1

关键词

Citrus; Leaf water relations; Photosynthesis; Proline; Rootstocks; Salinity

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria [RTI2018-098379-R-I00]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the tolerance of new citrus hybrid varieties to salt stress compared to Carrizo citrange. The results showed that some hybrids displayed severe growth inhibition and leaf damage under salt stress, while proline accumulation seemed to be a common response to salinization. Enhanced K+ uptake and transport rates were identified as key factors linked to improved salt tolerance in some genotypes.
This work evaluates new citrus hybrid tolerance to salt stress compared to Carrizo citrange. Growth parameters, ion concentration, photosynthetic parameters, leaf water relation, plant damage and proline concentration were assessed in plants irrigated with 0 (control) or 60 mM of NaCl for 60 days. Some hybrids presented marked salt-stress symptomatology like sharp decreases in plant biomass and RGR parameter, and high leaf burn and abscission percentages. While Cl- accumulation in most salinised genotypes was recorded in all the plant fractions, accumulation occurred in some hybrids only in their aerial organs. Stomatal conductance also lowered under salt conditions in all the hybrids, whereas the internal CO2 concentration (Ci) tended to increase. Salt stress lowered the leaf water potentials in all the 0501 hybrids. As a response, the salinised plants induced proline accumulation. The main trait that improved salt tolerance in some genotypes is apparently linked with the imbalance among Cl-, Na+ and K+ ions, especially enhanced K+ uptake and transport rates which delay plant damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据