4.7 Article

Analysis of State Forest Institutions in the Republic of Moldova, Using a Causative Model

期刊

FORESTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12010105

关键词

Moldova; state forest institutions; sustainable forest management; causative evaluation; forest policy

类别

资金

  1. Transilvania University of Brasov

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The forest sector in the Republic of Moldova is still struggling to adapt to post-communist socio-economic realities, with state institutions not performing well in terms of sustainable management, facing financial difficulties that threaten the fulfillment of sustainability goals.
With state institutions playing a determinant role and the state owning 86% of the forestland, the forest sector in the Republic of Moldova still strives to adapt to post-communist socio-economic realities. This paper evaluates the performance of forest state institutions in achieving ambitious policy goals oriented toward sustainable management and enhancing forest protection functions. The performance of the Moldsilva Agency; State Forest Enterprises; and Ministry of Agriculture, Regional Development and Environment were evaluated, using the criteria of the 3L Model. The research combined participatory observations, face-to-face semi-structured interviews and secondary empirical evidence. The results indicate a paternalistic regulatory approach, with state authority institutions giving marginal importance to non-state forests, and low-efficiency state forest management institutions having financial difficulties that threaten the fulfillment of sustainability goals. The Moldsilva Agency has a central role in intra-/inter-sectorial coordination and cooperation. The authorities should seriously consider a more precise formulation of policy goals, with solid budgetary support along with institutional measures aiming at more efficient forest management structures and higher concern for non-state forests and society's demands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据