4.4 Article

Zr-MOFs based BiOBr/UiO-66 nanoplates with enhanced photocatalytic activity for tetracycline degradation under visible light irradiation

期刊

AIP ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0030228

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81660708]
  2. Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2018389]
  3. Double First Class University Plan [CPU2018GY25]
  4. Qinglan Project of Young Academic Leaders of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concern about the removal of antibiotics and utilization of solar energy on environmental modification has motivated the development of photocatalysts. In this work, an organic-inorganic composite based on zirconium metal-organic frameworks and BiOBr/UiO-66 nanoplates was successfully synthesized by a facile in situ assembly. The BiOBr/UiO-66 nanocomposites presented distinctly enhanced photocatalytic degradation performance and mineralization ability toward the tetracycline (TC) under visible light irradiation. The maximum degradation activity was about 2.15 times higher than that of pristine BiOBr, and the 83.84% mineralization rate was obtained within 150 min, when the UiO-66 reached 8% in the mass ratio of raw materials, compared to theoretical BiOBr. According to the analysis of morphology characterization, phase structure, optical performance, and electrochemical measurements, the enhancement of the photo-generated electron-hole pair transfer and separation efficiency led to the improved photocatalytic performance of BiOBr/UiO-66. The reactive species were also tested through radical scavenging experiments, revealing that the main active radicals were superoxide radicals and holes during the degradation of TC. Additionally, a probable degradation route of TC has been proposed after high-performance liquid chromatography and LC/MS-MS analysis, and the photo-oxidative mechanism of TC degradation was further explored with the energy band structure measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据