4.7 Article

Response of macroalgae and macroinvertebrates to anthropogenic disturbance gradients in rocky shores

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 850-864

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.038

关键词

Marine; Intertidal; Nutrient enrichment; Biological quality elements; Comparative response; Opportunist/sensitive taxa

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the Portuguese Operational Human Potential Program (POPH)
  2. Portuguese National Strategic Reference Framework (QREN Portugal)
  3. Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology, and Higher Education (MCTES) [SFRH/BD/74524/2010, SFRH/BD/108224/2015, SFRH/BD/82014/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/82014/2011, SFRH/BD/74524/2010, SFRH/BD/108224/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The compliance of macroalgal and macroinvertebrate assemblages to anthropogenic disturbance gradients (e.g., nutrient enrichment) was investigated at intertidal rocky shores. Macroalgae and macroinvertebrates presented parallel behavior, both showing shifts in the communities' structural variation along the gradients, in which an higher number of opportunistic species (and higher abundances) were found in more stressful sites (close to the disturbance source), in contrast to less disturbed sites (far from the disturbance source), which showed higher presence of more sensitive species (and higher abundance of several of them). The macroinvertebrate abundance and taxonomic composition, which are parameters required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) to be included in tools for the ecological quality status assessment, responded to the disturbance gradient. Results suggest that the macroinvertebrate biological element might be considered an indicator of disturbance in intertidal rocky shores as good as the macroalgae, and therefore the development of a specific methodology based solely on benthic macroinvertebrates of rocky shores, presently a gap in the ecological quality status assessment for the WFD, seems feasible. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据