4.7 Article

Biocompatible Iron-Boron Nanoparticles Designed for Neutron Capture Therapy Guided by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202001632

关键词

bimetallic nanoparticles; boron neutron capture therapy; laser ablation; magnetic nanoparticles; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. University of Padova STARS grant 4NANOMED
  2. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation great relevance project [0191594]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe-B NPs with multiple functions, including assisting neutron capture therapy and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as magnetic properties, have high payload and biocompatibility, promising to enhance the efficacy and tolerability of boron NCT.
The combination of multiple functions in a single nanoparticle (NP) represents a key advantage of nanomedicine compared to traditional medical approaches. This is well represented by radiotherapy in which the dose of ionizing radiation should be calibrated on sensitizers biodistribution. Ideally, this is possible when the drug acts both as radiation enhancer and imaging contrast agent. Here, an easy, one-step, laser-assisted synthetic procedure is used to generate iron-boron (Fe-B) NPs featuring the set of functions required to assist neutron capture therapy (NCT) with magnetic resonance imaging. The Fe-B NPs exceed by three orders of magnitude the payload of boron isotopes contained in clinical sensitizers. The Fe-B NPs have magnetic properties of interest also for magnetophoretic accumulation in tissues and magnetic hyperthermia to assist drug permeation in tissues. Besides, Fe-B NPs are biocompatible and undergo slow degradation in the lysosomal environment that facilitates in vivo clearance through the liver-spleen-kidneys pathway. Overall, the Fe-B NPs represent a new promising tool for future exploitation in magnetic resonance imaging-guided boron NCT at higher levels of efficacy and tolerability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据