4.5 Article

Anatomy and White Matter Connections of the Parahippocampal Gyrus

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 E218-E226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.136

关键词

Anatomy; DTI; Parahippocampal gyrus; Tractography; White matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on the parahippocampal gyrus using diffusion tensor imaging revealed its critical role in cognitive functions and memory processing. It identified connections with the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and cingulum, providing insights into potential postoperative cognitive decline. The research contributes to a better understanding of executive functioning following surgery for limbic tumors.
BACKGROUND: The parahippocampal gyrus is understood to have a role in high cognitive functions including memory encoding and retrieval and visuospatial processing. A detailed understanding of the exact location and nature of associated white tracts could significantly improve postoperative morbidity related to declining capacity. Through diffusion tensor imagingLbased fiber tracking validated by gross anatomic dissection as ground truth, we have characterized these connections based on relationships to other well-known structures. METHODS: Diffusion imaging from the Human Connectome Project for 10 healthy adult controls was used for tractography analysis. We evaluated the parahippocampal gyrus as a whole based on connectivity with other regions. All parahippocampal gyrus tracts were mapped in both hemispheres, and a lateralization index was calculated with resultant tract volumes. RESULTS: We identified 2 connections of the parahippocampal gyrus: inferior longitudinal fasciculus and cingulum. Lateralization of the cingulum was detected (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The parahippocampal gyrus is an important center for memory processing. Subtle differences in executive functioning following surgery for limbic tumors may be better understood in the context of the fiberbundle anatomy highlighted by this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据